Questlogs using this decklist | |
---|---|
None. |
Fellowships using this decklist | |
---|---|
None. |
Derived from |
---|
None. Self-made deck here. |
Inspiration for |
---|
None yet. |
Card draw simulator |
---|
Odds:
0% –
0% –
0%
more
|
Gameplay simulator | ||
---|---|---|
|
||
Hand
|
||
In Play
|
||
Deck
|
||
Discard Pile
|
LEGOlas 131
This is a 100-card, secrecy, song, Silvan, Hobbit, The Last Alliance, victory display deck. It also has a subtheme of side quests. I considered adding Legacy Blade but could not find space.
;)
There is a surprising amount of synergy in a deck this stupid.
-
Hobbits allow for Good Meal which can lower the cost of Out of the Wild and all the other events
-
Secrecy allows for Leaf Brooch which further lowers costs
-
Keen as Lances can become cheaper through Ho! Tom Bombadil!
-
O Lórien!, The Road Goes Ever On, Drinking Song, Ho! Tom Bombadil!, Song of Kings, Song of Wisdom all trigger Love of Tales
-
Henamarth Riversong can scry for Needful to Know so you can get maximum threat reduction
-
Gather Information and Drinking Song can find Love of Tales faster
-
Frodo Baggins keeps the deck in secrecy while allowing Rossiel to quest and defend
-
Gaffer Gamgee can provide defence until Rossiel is online
-
Galadhrim Minstrel can help find the key events
-
The Last Alliance allows The Shirefolk to be played
If anyone actually cares about the efficiency of this deck Timely Aid should be replaced with Wealth of Adventure and Heed the Dream.
Thanks for viewing this monstrosity. Please give it a heart just to show that dumb ideas can be beautiful.
8 comments |
---|
Jun 23, 2022 |
Jun 23, 2022I would love some criticism (probably more like insults for a deck this bad (: ) Unless, I am missing something, Tom Bombadillo! has no victory point. You link Ho! Tom Bombadil! instead. |
Jun 23, 2022the card you linked in your description (3. point) has a victory point, and to that card i refer ;) o.k. then my opinion to the deck: playing with signifikantly more cards than 50 is only worth it, if you have extraordinare carddraw (or discarding/mining) and can do something with that cards or play A Perilous Voyage both does not happen in this case. why is it bad general?:
what i critisise in this special deck:
so, overall, what is your goal with the deck? make it more specific anf then concentrate it to that goal. you cannot achieve all o the goals. so if i interpret it correctly:
these are wishes for 2-3 decks ;) take 2 (perhaps 3) of the wishes and optimize them OR play A Perilous Voyage then with the contract you can a much better pilot to et the cards you need. i can give advice for a reduced wishes-goals, but you have to choose what is at higher prority. (i would go full hobbit-secrecy spam events goal, but others are also possible) |
Jun 23, 2022I am fully aware that this deck has way too many goals (That's the whole point). Just so you know, this is my older, purely for fun account. If you want to see slightly better decks, see my other account: "NERD" Thank you for all the feedback. Originally the deck was 60 cards, without secrecy or The Last Alliance, but instead I decided to have some fun, since the deck was useless anyway. |
Jun 23, 2022if you want to play 100 the A Perilous Voyage give more decisions and benefits than the The Last Alliance with only 20 allies. and stay at 100 start with secrecy would be better, so take Folco Boffin instead of Rossiel OR (i think you want the Fatty Bolger --Rossiel synergy), take a cheap motk-hero as 3. |
Jun 24, 2022Actually, this deck does start in secrecy thanks to Fatty Bolger: ringsdb doesn't appear to take the "Setup: Reduce your threat by 2" into account. The combo with Frodo Baggins and Rossiel should, if all goes well, keep you in secrecy for the rest of the game with the help of The Shirefolk. Personally, I'd cut Timely Aid in exchange for the third copies of Leave No Trace, None Return, and Tom Bombadillo! In addition, just because I like taking the encounter deck apart, I'd probably try to find room for Weep No More!, though I understand leaving it out. |
Jun 24, 2022
|
Jun 24, 2022o.k. i oversaw that, but for my taste only 1 card more he needs (or 2 if you count gaffer to it) in his 100, i just see no sense in a deck that never in a game can accomplish all its roles. and my fun would be to make 1-2 roles better than 5 a little bit. but if anybody has fun with it, who i am to make it worse ;) |
Ho! Tom Bombadil! has a victorypoint, so, no discount for Keen as Lances
else, i have nothing good to say to the deck, so, tell me if you want my bad opinion ;)